What is time? -

August 09, 2020 Jason Resch Episode 5 Podcast
What is time? -
Show Notes Transcript

What is time? Few things are so familiar and mysterious. Time is the most common noun in the English language. Our lives are governed by time, and yet we have so little understanding of it.

In today's episode, we will consider what science has to tell us about time. We find that it is stranger than anyone could have imagined, at least, anyone before Einstein.

Original article:
Youtube episode:

Support the show (
Amy :

You are listening to the always podcast. This is episode number five. Today's question, what is time? Time is the most common noun in the English language, yet its nature eludes us. In today's episode, we will consider the true nature of time and see why relativity has revealed time to be stranger than anyone imagined, at least anyone before Einstein enjoy.

Brian :

What is time, few things are so familiar and mysterious. Our lives are governed by time, and yet we have so little understanding of it. In many ways, time behaves like a dimension. We move through and have a position in time just as we move through and have a position in space. Every event happening and meeting can be specified by its temporal and spatial coordinates. But unlike dimensions of space, we have no say over our speed and direction in time, we can neither stop nor turn around. We only go forward unalterably at the rate of one second per second. Adding to the strangeness of the time dimension, we even measure it differently. While we use rulers to measure distances in space, measuring distances in time requires clocks. But until 1905, no one had any idea just how strange time really is. This was the year Einstein overturned millennia old notion that time is an absolute, fixed and independent aspect of the universe. He showed that time is relative malleable and dependent on observers. The Miracle year, one person in one year revolutionized physics. Then 26 year old Albert Einstein Stein published four papers in 1905. They established 20th century physics as we know it. This year is called Einstein's miracle year. March explained the photoelectric effect discovered photons may explain Brownian motion established existence of atoms. June published special relativity Showtime is not what we thought. September proved mass energy equivalence masses energy. Nearly every equation in physics describes relationships between time, space, energy and mass. With these papers, Einstein revised our understanding of the mall. Some millennia old ideas were vindicated, others vanquished Einstein proved the existence of atoms, which had remained an unproven theory since the time of the ancient Greeks. Together with mass energy equivalence, the atomic age was born. Einstein also settled an equally long standing debate as to whether light was composed of particles or waves. By showing that light is made of particles, he established the field of quantum mechanics, most of our electronic and digital technologies based on quantum mechanics. See, our episode does everything that can happen actually happen. But perhaps the most significant paper of Einstein's miracle year was on the electrodynamics of moving bodies. It is still established special relativity and flipped on its head our understanding of space and time, special relativity. Any of Einstein's miracle year papers could have earned a Nobel Prize. But in 1921, the prize committee chose to award Einstein not for special relativity, but for his paper on the photoelectric effect. Special relativity and its consequences were just too strange. In the 1920s decades after Einstein published his theory, still no experiment had been done to confirm it. And so, while believed true by most physicists, special relativity remains controversial. overturning tradition. Special Relativity overturned an idea espoused by Newton and believed since Euclid who established geometry in 300 BC. This was the idea that time and space are absolutes, meaning they are constant, fixed, independent of all things and universally agreed upon. If time is absolute then everyone should agree on the order of events. Moreover, everyone should agree on what exists and happens in the present moment of time. Absolute time also implies that time flows at the same rate for everyone, but relativity forces us to give up all these ideas. The right time flows, the order of events, and even the content of the present are no longer absolutes, but relative. Different observers may disagree on all these facts, but they can all be right from their own relative viewpoints. Under relativity, time is not a rigid clockwork that runs the universe. It melts away to something more Mercurial time becomes something that we can alter our speed and direction through strange predictions of special relativity. If we thought time was strange, it only gets stranger with relativity. relativity can be traced to a thought Einstein had at 16. He wondered, what would it be like to ride alongside a beam of light? By the age of 26, Einstein had worked it all out But the consequences were bizarre. Special Relativity made the following predictions. One, the faster something goes, the slower Time passes for it, time dilation to the faster something goes, the shorter it becomes length contraction. Three clocks agreeing at rest disagree in motion clock the synchronization for the order of events in time is not absolute relativity of simultaneity. In Einstein's theory, the speed of light is absolute. Every observer agrees on the constancy of the speed of light. But for this to be true, we must abandon space and time as absolutes. When time is not absolute observers can disagree on the right time flows and we get time dilation likewise, When space is not absolute, observers can disagree on distances and we get length contraction. Together. This creates disagreement on what happens when and where leading to clock the synchronization and relativity of simultaneity. To appreciate the strangeness of relativity is predictions, it helps to play around with the calculator below. Special Relativity calculator, try velocities such as 00, point one 0.5 0.95 0.999, and one. speeds we generally consider high, like the speed of sound are slow compared to the speed of light, and object breaking the sound barrier travels at just 0.0001% the speed of light. Since relativistic effects are negligible when velocities are small, it took decades before any of these predictions could be tested confirmations of special relativity. As incredible as these predictions were over the 20th century, all of these effects of relativity have been confirmed in experiments. In fact, everyday you might confirm relativity without realizing it. technologies like GPS would not be possible without accounting for time dilation. That car batteries work at all is due to effects of special relativity within lead atoms. relativity accounts for many chemical properties like why Mercury is a liquid and why gold is yellow. electrons in gold atoms travel at over half the speed of light. under special relativity, This causes the electrons to gain momentum which makes the electrons preferentially absorb blue light rather than invisible UV light. If not, for this effect, gold will be silver in color. Each time you hear a car's ignition, see the glint of a gold ring or use GPS to get somewhere. You reconfirm Einstein's theory is the speed of light constant. All predictions of special relativity follow from two assumptions. The first is that the laws of physics work the same regardless of one's speed or direction. The second is that the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their speed or direction. This is known as the principle of invariant light speed. Though it seems innocuous, this is what leads to the strange effects predicted by relativity. You might consider yourself to be addressed right now. But you along with our galaxy, are moving at speeds over a million miles per hour. Earth spins at over 1600 kilometers per hour around its axis. It also circles the son of a woman hundred thousand kilometers per hour. Earth together with the rest of her Solar System orbits the galactic center at nearly a million kilometers per hour. Further, our galaxy and neighboring galaxies are falling towards an unseen mass called the Great attractor at over 2 million kilometers per hour. But regardless of our direction of motion through space, or the angle from which we measure it, the speed of light is always the same. Ranging the Moon The moon is circling the earth at 3679 kilometers per hour. With the winding orbit of the moon around Earth, the earth circling the sun and Earth's daily spinning, the relative motion and position between the Earth and the Moon is always changing. Sometimes the moon is behind us. Other times it's ahead, and it's still other times it's to our side. Despite these changes, scientists Find no difference in how long it takes for light to get to the moon and back. Apollo astronauts left mirrors on the moon, the lunar ranging retro reflectors, scientists on earth can bounce lasers off these mirrors to get a return signal. Scientists have measured how long it takes a laser beam to go to the moon and back. The beam is bounced off retro reflectors, which like the reflectors on bikes reflect light in the direction it came from. Only one photon in 10 to the power of 17 makes it back. But this is enough for us to measure the distance to the moon to the precision of a millimeter. It's a stunning confirmation of the principle of invariance speed of light. Regardless of the speed, direction, or relative motion between the Earth and Moon, the time it takes for light to get to the moon and back is the same and so we conclude the speed of light is the same measuring time directly testing somebody predictions of relativity is difficult. Since the effects like time dilation are negligible, we're not traveling close to the speed of light, confirming it requires either very fast vehicles or very accurate clocks, or perhaps some combination. It's easy to forget that in 1905 cars were the fastest vehicle and the most accurate clocks were based on pendulums. The 20th century saw great improvements in both vehicle speeds and clock accuracy. All clocks are based on resonators, something that cycles of regular intervals. Fox count these cycles or ticks to measure time. In grandfather clocks, the resonator is a swinging pendulum. In mechanical watches, it's a bouncing spring. In digital clocks, it's the electrically stimulated vibrations of a quartz crystal. Given manufacturing defects, these methods are only accurate. No to pendulums, springs or quartz crystals are exactly alike, and further differences in temperature or pressure can throw them off. atomic clocks. All atoms have the same isotope are identical. As early as 1879. Lord Kelvin proposed using atomic resonances to keep time. But it was not until 1955, several months after Einstein's death that the first accurate atomic clock was built. Every atom preferentially absorbs specific frequencies of light. Therefore, we can use atoms to tune lights to exact frequencies. Once the light is tuned by these atoms, we can build a clock that counts the oscillations of the light wave. atomic clocks, rather than counting pendulum swings, counts the oscillations of an electronic signal that generates light especially specific frequency tuned by identical atoms. The cesium 133 isotope was chosen to be used in all atomic clocks. cesium was selected for having a lone electron in its outer shell. This makes it especially sensitive to exaptation. Wireless stopwatch mic tracks seconds to three decimal places, the atomic flux tracks seconds to 10 decimal places, the Lightwave that cesium absorbs best ticks 9,192,631,770 times per second. These clocks provided sufficient accuracy to directly test time dilation, time dilation. time dilation is one of the stranger predictions of special relativity. It says that the faster something moves, the slower it experiences time, quote. If one of two things synchronous clocks at A's moved in a closed curve with constant velocity until it returns to a the journey lasting t seconds, then by the clock which has remained at rest, the traveled clock on its arrival at a will be one half t times v squared divided by c squared seconds slow. And quote, Albert Einstein in on the electrodynamics of moving bodies 1905. Time doesn't just seem to go slower. It actually passes more slowly by every physical measure. Clocks run slower, radioactive atoms decay slower, and life forms age and metabolize slower. If you were subject to time dilation, you wouldn't notice because even your brain activity and thought patterns would operate more slowly. But if you were to later meet up with someone who didn't undergo time dilation, you would find they have aged more than you. This leads to the fact his twin paradox where according to special relativity, one of two identical twins goes on a high speed space voyage and returns to find their sibling significantly older. testing time dilation, despite the strangeness of time dilation and what it leads to, it has been tested and confirmed as a genuine phenomenon. The first evidence came in 1932 with the Kennedy phone like experiment, however, the evidence was indirect. In 1907, Einstein said one way to directly test it is to look for a transverse Doppler effect in light from a fast moving source. This effect is due to time dilation experienced by a moving light source. It took experimenters 30 years to figure out a way to test this technology to accelerate flashlights to near light speed didn't exist. Experiment experimenters have to get creative pervert is created The color fax machine in 1924 and the video phone in 1927. In 1938 Ives together with his colleague gr Stillwell designed and executed the first experimental test of time dilation. The tube filter device that used electrodes charged 240 3000 volts to accelerate charged hydrogen ions to half a percent the speed of light. These atoms were charged by stripping them of an electron. When a charged atom reclaims an electron, it releases a particle of light. In effect, single hydrogen atoms acted like miniature flashlights, it was enough to confirm Einstein's prediction. It was also the first direct confirmation of special relativity 33 years after it was published. twin paradox does time dilation really apply to such things as people could time dilation? Really cool As a person to age less, it seems absurd. But according to the theory, that trip on a fast rocket would allow one twin to age five years while the other ages 50. To test this, engineers needed either a very fast vessel or a very accurate clock, or perhaps some combination of each. With the rise of commercial air travel in 1952, and the invention of the atomic clock in 1955, it became possible to test the twin paradox. In 1971, two experimenters Joseph hafler and Richard Keating flew around the world with a pair of atomic clocks. After the trip hafler and Keating compared the time on their clocks to the time of atomic clocks that were left behind. The clocks they brought with them now ran behind the clocks that stayed home. The clocks and accordingly the people that stay put aged more hafler Keating Pilots the plane, and the clocks they took with them all aged less by about 50 nanoseconds. It was a small effect, but enough to notice using atomic clocks. The amount of time they lost was exactly what relativity predicted. time dilation is real time dilation and GPS. you verify time dilation every time you use GPS. GPS is based on extremely accurate timekeeping. When GPS detects you moved over by one foot, it did so by noticing the radio signal from one of these satellites now takes one nanosecond longer to reach you. The more precise the clock, the more precisely GPS can determine your location. To keep its rhythm, each GPS satellite has its own atomic clock onboard. But to remain in orbit, each satellite has to move at a very high speed approximate roughly four kilometers per second, about 9000 miles per hour. at this speed, relativity predicts the clocks will run slower by seven microseconds a day. It seems insignificant, but this loss of time would throw GPS off by about two kilometers a day. GPS would soon be useless. Fortunately, the designers of GPS knew about time dilation. They took it into account and adjusted the clocks to run faster to compensate for this effect. Given that GPS works with these adjusted clocks confirms that we experience time differently than GPS satellites do significant time dilation for hafler and Keating flying around the world and for GPS satellites, the loss of time amounts to just fractions of a second, but these differences in time are only negligible because the speeds are negligible compared to the speed of light The last time is small because compared to the speed of light the speed is small. Jets travel at just 0.0001% the speed of light and GPS satellites at 0.00134%. But at 98%, the speed of light time is dilated by a factor of five. That means we experienced five seconds for each second experienced by an object traveling at 98% light speed. At 99%, the speed of light Time passes seven times slower. Under relativity, there is no limit to how much slower time can run. It is only a matter of how close to light speed you can get. photons which travel at the speed of light, experience no time at all. To a photon, the entire history of the universe unfolds in an instant particle accelerators technology to accelerate objects to great speeds now exists. In fact, if you have an OLED TV that isn't a flat screen, it contains technology that accelerates particles to 10% the speed of light. But modern particle accelerators can do better. The Large Hadron Collider, the world's most powerful particle accelerator can accelerate particles to 99.9999991% the speed of light. at this speed Time passes 7454 times slower. significant time dilation effects have been confirmed that we can't yet accelerate large objects like clocks to near the speed of light. Unstable particles can serve as miniature clocks. For instance, we might use muons. They are unstable particles with an average lifetime of 2.2 microseconds in 1900 77 researchers at CERN accelerated neurons to 99.941% the speed of light. at this speed, they observed the muon survived an average of 64 microseconds, almost 30 times longer than usual. This confirms the twin paradox. That person accelerated to this speed would age 30 times slower than the rest of us left on earth. But there is a problem. How can the speed of light be constant for everyone when, according to relativity, not everyone experiences time in the same way, speed after all, is distance divided by time length contraction. The only way for the speed of light to be constant for everyone when observers measure time differently is if observers also measure space, distances and lengths differently. This leads to relativities prediction of length contraction spheric muons let's consider the case of a new one created in the upper atmosphere by a cosmic ray collision. We'll assume it travels straight down to earth from where it formed 15 kilometers overhead. At the muon speed of 99.5% the speed of light, it will take 50 microseconds to cross this 15 kilometer distance and reach Earth. This time is well beyond the average life of the muon, which is just two points in microseconds. And yet, experiments show that due to time dilation, this new one has a good chance of surviving to reach Earth's surface. But from the muon zone frame of reference, it is addressed and Earth is coming towards it at 99.5% the speed of light. How can the muon have a chance of lasting 50 microseconds it will take for Earth to run into it. This is because the mew on experiences space differently as the story bead of an object increases its length contracts along its direction of travel. From the muons point of view, the entire Earth is flattened squished along its direction of travel. at a velocity of 99.5% the speed of light, the length shrinks by a factor of 10. Instead of being 12,000 kilometres wide berth appears just 1200 kilometers wide. Earth's atmosphere, instead of being 100 kilometers thick, seems only 10 kilometers thick. The 15 kilometres to the surface is reduced to just 1.5 kilometers. These are not optical illusions, but distortions of space. They're as real as distortions to time caused by time dilation. Given these spatial distortions, the muon can judge itself to have a good chance of surviving long enough to reach the surface. interstellar travel The corresponding effects of time dilation and length contraction arise in interstellar travel. Should we put people on a rocket that accelerates to 99.5% the speed of light, those astronauts will experience time at one 10th the rate we do a 75 year lifespan becomes 750 years. at this speed, they could survive a trip to a star 300 light years away. So those onboard the journey takes just 30 years. But everything remains consistent from the perspective of those on the rocket, they are not violating the speed of light by crossing 300 light years in 30 years time. Instead, the distance and all of space between Earth and this star contracts by a factor of 10. To them, the star is 30 light years away. And so at near the speed of light they arrive in 30 years whenever there is time. dilation, there is length contraction, there are two sides of the same coin. It is also mutual. To those on Earth, we see their rocket ship has contracted to one 10th its length before it launched. length contraction and time dilation apply both ways. from Earth, we see the rocket as length contracted and time dilated. From the rocket, they see earth as length contracted and time dilated. By making the speed of light a universal constant, we must give up time and space as universal constants. Instead, observers moving in different speeds or directions disagree on both time and space length contraction on atomic scales. Many doubted whether these effects were genuine physical phenomena. Einstein, however, defended the view that these effects were real and could be demonstrated quote The question as to whether length contraction really exists or not is misleading. It doesn't really exist in so far as it doesn't exist for a co moving observer. No, it really exists I in such a way that it could be demonstrated in principle by physical means by a non co moving observer. And quote, Albert Einstein 1911. Using particle accelerators, researchers at the relativistic heavy ion collider accelerate the nuclei of gold atoms to 99.995% the speed of light. at this speed, the normally round atomic nuclei become length contracted by 100 fold and appeared as fat pancakes. The outcomes of these collisions can only be explained by accounting for the increased density of the nucleus caused by length contraction. length contraction on astronomical scales, aside from looking for the length contraction of the smallest scales, we can also look upwards to find astronomical confirmations, we can see the effects of length contraction in some of the largest objects. We have seen jets of particles are blasted from the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy m 87. The M 87. Particle jet traveling near the speed of light has a blue hue due to length contraction. length contraction has a multiplying effect on the frequency of the emitted light in the direction of travel. This jet emanates from one of the largest celestial objects ever photographed a black hole 6.5 billion times heavier than the sun. This is the same black hole famously photographed in 2019. Understanding special relativity How could reality be so strange? How can it be that time and space can flex and bend so radically from one person's view to another's Actually, it all makes perfect sense once we understand what time really is, space time. When an object, say a 100 meter long rocket is accelerated to 60% of the speed of light, its length decreases to 80% of its length when it's rest. And objects length at rest is known as its proper length. But this formerly 100 meter rocket at this speed is just 80 meters long. What happens to its extra length? Where does it go? For example, consider that a pencil on your desk can use all of its length to reach through the east west dimension. But if you rotate it, it can use 80% of its length to reach across the east west dimension and 60% of its length to reach across the north south dimension. The formula describing rotation and lengths of this pencil is the same math for calculating length contraction in special relativity, length contraction is an effective rotation. It is analogous to tilting an umbrella formerly pointed straight at the sun, its shadow contracts along the direction the umbrella is tilted. spacetime and length contraction. Likewise, the three dimensional shadow or projection of an object rotated in four dimensional space contracts. But what could this extra fourth dimension be that objects rotating? According to relativity, it's time. Rockets addressed like the horizontal pencil uses its entire length to reach through space and none of its length to reach through time. And accelerated rocket, on the other hand, has a different direction through spacetime. It is rotated and only uses some of its proper length to reach across space. The phenomenon of length contraction is therefore an artifact of rotating an object in this unified view of space and time, space time, we see the three dimensional shadows of what are really four dimensional objects. The Rockets length in space time does not change. An object space time length always equals its proper length. So according to relativity in this space time view, when the rocket is addressed, it uses all of its length to reach through space, but when accelerated, it uses some of its length to reach through time. This suggests that space and time are measures of the same thing. All physical objects that reached through space when in motion reached through time. Time is just another dimension of space like width, height, and depth. It is the fourth dimension. This is why physicists created the word space time. Rather than treat time and space separately. It embodies the unified whole Quote, the views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, And therein lies their strength, they are radical. Henceforth space by itself and time by itself are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. And quote, Einstein's Professor Herman men koski in space and time 1909, space, time and twins. This spacetime model not only provides an intuitive understanding of length contraction, but also explains time dilation and the twin paradox. Take for example, the case of two twins Sam and Pam. Sam stays on earth for 10 years while his sister Pam travels to the star proximus and torian back at 80% the speed of light Sam remains on earth and uses all of his speed to travel through time. Pam travels at 80% the speed of light to reach Proxima Centauri four light years away. The trip there takes five years from Sam's point of view, but only three from Pam's point of view. The proper length of both Sam's and Pam's paths through spacetime is 10 light years, but because Pam used 80% of her speed to travel through space, she could only use 60% of her speed to travel through time. So while some aged 10 years, Pam aged only six while observers may disagree on distances in space, or distances in time, all observers agree on distances through space time, like the speed of light spacetime lengths or absolute clock synchronization. The rotation of objects in four dimensions suggests an entirely new phenomenon. plati synchronisation clock synchronization is different from time dilation. Property synchronization is the effect where two clocks that agree when addressed will disagree on the time when they move. This applies even when the clocks move together. For example, when on the same rocket, but when the rocket comes to a halt, the two clocks will once again agree on the time. For example, two clocks one at the front and the other in the rear of a rocket agree on time when the rocket is addressed. When moving however, the clock in the rear will run ahead of the clock at the front. If I The clock is brought to the location of the other in the direction of motion, the clocks will agree, but when separated along the direction of motion they disagree. each end of the rocket is in a different time and of a different age. The Rockets really does reach through time in the case of clock D, synchronization rulers can measure time and clocks can measure lengths. It is another confirmation that time and space are made of the same stuff and are units of the same thing. When converting units of space and time, such as when measuring distances in space time, the conversion is straightforward. One light years, one year, one light second is one second 3.33 microseconds is one kilometer, and one nanosecond is about one foot. You could say that when an object seems to be addressed, in actuality it is traveling through time at the speed of light. Quote, why can't you travel faster than light? The reason you can't go faster than the speed of light is that you can't go slower. There is only one speed, everything including you is always moving at the speed of light. How can you be moving if you are at rest in a chair, you are moving through time And quote, Lewis Carroll Epstein in relativity visualized 1981. relativity of simultaneity clock the synchronization implies a still strange phenomenon. The relativity of simultaneity quotes are two events. For example, the two strokes of lightning A and B, which are simultaneous with reference to the railway embankment also simultaneous relatively to the train. We shall show directly that the answer must be in the negative, end quote, Albert Einstein relativity, the special and the general theory 1916. Observers can even disagree on the order in which events take place. One observer might believe events A and B happened at the same time, another can conclude a happened before B A third could consistently determined B happened before A. Moreover, all three are correct from their own frames of reference. For example, consider two stars in our night sky beetle Jews in the constellation Orion 82 Korean in the constellation Kareena. Both are supergiant stars near the end of their lives. When they die, they will explode as brilliant supernovae. for several days afterwards, they could appear as bright as the moon and be visible during the day, as was the case in the supernova of 1054. If by chance Beetlejuice and deja Carini go supernova at the same time, from our point of view, then according to relativity, there are others who will conclude that people Jews went supernova first and still others who will conclude that et Carini went supernova first. This has nothing to do with the time it takes like to reach us. We assumed scientists on earth and aliens on other worlds took all of that into account when they calculated when the stars went supernova. The disagreement stems from an effective rotation in spacetime as in case of clock D synchronization. It is clocked at synchronization paired with the fact that different observers can have different relative speeds compared to a pair of clocks. A pair of clocks that appear synchronized from one point of view can from another point of view appear desynchronized. Consider the case of a slow moving docking port about to dock with a station while a rocket flies by. From the docking pods point of view or frame. The station is addressed while the rocket is flying by the docking port also sees two clocks on the station strike 9am simultaneously from the rocket ships frame. It is a dress while the station and docking port fly by in the opposite direction. In this frame, the station and pot are rotated in spacetime. Accordingly, the rocket ship sees the clocks as desynchronized. The clock on the right strikes 9am before the clock on the left. If a rocket flies rightwards by a space station while two clocks on the station simultaneously strike nine and those on the rocket will not consider the strikes to be simultaneous. They will consider the clock on the right to strike 9am before the clock on the left. Likewise for another rocket traveling in the opposite direction, it would see the clock on the left strike nine m before the clock on the right. Hence, we get three different but nonetheless equally valid interpretations on the order of the events. How can this be events in space time? the breakdown of a consensus comes down to the fact that space and time are not absolute. asking what event happens first He's like asking what seed comes first in an apple. The direction we choose to slice through the apple determines the order the seeds are encountered. Events are embedded in spacetime like seeds are embedded in apples. There is no absolute ordering to the seeds. The order you encounter them depends on the angle you choose to slice through the apple. in relativity, one's direction through space time determines this slicing angle. It explains why different observers traveling at different speeds or directions through space time disagree on the order of events. What an observer takes to be their present time is equivalent to the 3d cross section of one of these slices through 4d spacetime. Evidence of four dimensional space time. Could reality be so strange? It seems so. relativity of simultaneity is an inevitable consequence of special relativity. Without it, the latter paradox can't be explained. Moreover, scientists have confirmed the existence of clock D synchronization and its associated relativity of simultaneity through the observation of the signac effect. This effect is the basis of a technology civilization depends on if you've ever flown on a commercial jet or used a product delivered by a commercial ship, you've taken advantage of technology based on relativity and the effects that produce clock the synchronization. This technologies the ring laser gyroscope, mechanical gyroscopes have long been used for navigation on aircraft, ships and spacecraft. Modern gyroscopes based on lasers have no moving parts. They send two beams of light in opposite directions around the ring. Timing differences indicate angular motion of the vehicle. Aside from improve reliability ring laser gyroscopes are extremely sensitive. They can detect rotation speeds as small as 0.00001 degrees per hour. To put this in context, the clocks our hand rotates at 30 degrees per hour, 3 million times faster. interchangeability of time and space. We seem that time and space are made of the same stuff. length contraction shows yardsticks can reach through and measure time. Clock the synchronization shows clocks can measure distance. In 1948 Richard Fineman took this idea and ran with it. He created what came to be known as Fineman diagrams, diagrams that detail physical interactions between particles. Fineman diagrams show that in every physical interaction, space and time are completely interchangeable. For instance, the following Fineman diagram shows the same physical interaction between an electron E and the photon, gamma. Depending on how we perceive this interaction rotated in spacetime, we can describe this same interaction very differently. This one interaction can variously be described as, one, the absorption of a photon by an electron to the emission of a photon by an electron, three electron positron antimatter annihilation for the emission of a photon via positron five, the absorption of a photon via positron and six electron positron pair production, but in all cases, it is the same picture of the same interaction just approached from different angles seem to unfold in different ways, messages from the future. Accordingly, the physicists stackelberg and Richard Fineman independently suggested that anti particles particles of anti matter are simply regular particles traveling backwards in time. For example, the positron, also called an anti electron can be considered an electron traveling backwards through time. The only difference between an electron and a positron is how it moves through space time relative to us. If valid, this is an indication that the future is real, antimatter is often considered an exotic material of science fiction. But anti matter was first discovered in 1932 by the physicist called David Anderson, earning him the 1936 Nobel Prize in Physics. Today, anti matter is used as the basis of several technologies anti matter In the form of positrons is used in hospitals around the world to perform PET scans. The pee in pet is short for positron. You don't have to go to a hospital or physics lab to find anti matter, there is a good chance that you can obtain anti matter from your local supermarket. Due to the radioactivity of bananas caused by the unstable potassium 40 present in them. The average banana has roughly 1.2 million radioactive events per day. Of those about one in 100,000 produces a positron. Therefore, each banana emits about 12 positrons a day or one every two hours. Conventionally, we say that banana emits a positron which strikes our hand, but an stackelberg and Richard Fineman would say it is an equally valid description to say our hand emits an electron that travels backwards through time to the banana under the Fineman stackelberg into The banana receives a message from the future in the form of an electron sent back in time. If you've ever wanted to own a time machine, you need only visit your local grocer. See our episode is time travel possible. The future has already happened. In the 1960s, scientists started to realize that if the core tenet of relativity is true, that there are no privileged reference frames, then the past, present, and future must all be considered equally real. The physicists CW rioted in 1966 and the mathematician Hilary Putnam, in 1967, used relativity to argue on the basis of the relativity of simultaneity that all events past, present and future are equally real. Quote, I conclude that the problem of the reality and the determinant pneus of future events is now solved. Moreover, it is solved by physics and not By philosophy, we have learned that we live in a four dimensional and not a three dimensional world, and that space and time or better space like separations and timeline separations are just two aspects of a single four dimensional continuum. And quote, Hilary Putnam, time and physical geometry 1967 the relativity of simultaneity tells us that any event in our past or in our future is in the present according to another reference frame. So if every reference frame is as valid as any other a no preferred frames of reference, we must accept the equal reality of all events. The Andromeda paradox. This idea was best illustrated by the mathematical physicist Roger Penrose, in a description now called the Andromeda paradox. Quote, two people pass each other on the street and according to one of the two People and Andromeda in space fleet has already set off on its journey while to the other, the decision as to whether or not the journey will actually take place has not yet been made. How can there still be some uncertainty as to the outcome of that decision? If to either person that decision has already been made, then surely there cannot be any uncertainty. the launching of the space fleet is an inevitability. In fact, neither of the people can yet know of the launching of the space fleet. They can know only later, when telescopic observations from Earth reveal that the fleet is indeed on its way, then they can hark back to that chance encounter and come to the conclusion that at that time, according to one of them, the decision lay in the uncertain future, while to the other it lay in the certain past. Was there then any uncertainty about that future? Or was the future of both people already fixed? End quote. Roger Penrose in the Emperor's New mind 1989. Here two observers, let's call them Alice and Bob are standing right next to each other. They meet at the same time and place, say the sidewalk at noon. However, according to relativity, because they are walking in different directions each belongs to a different present moment. Their presence contain different content. If Alice is walking in the direction towards the Andromeda Galaxy at three miles per hour, then her present contains Andromeda as it is for days in our at rest future. If Bobby's walking away from Andromeda three miles per hour is present contains Andromeda as it was for days in our past. Given that a week's time different separate sadnesses and Bob's versions of Andromeda in bops present aliens in Andromeda Mike plan to convene and vote on whether or not to launch and in fleet on the Milky Way. While analysis equally valid present, they have already voted and the invasion fleet has already launched. So Alice's present contains events that are in Bob's future. Likewise, events in galaxies Bob is walking towards and Alice is walking away from contain events for Bob that our analysis past. How can this be understanding the Andromeda paradox? It is merely a consequence of clock D synchronization played out over astronomical distances. Usually, we think relativity only comes into play at very high speeds. But if the distance between clocks is large enough, the time difference can be significant even at low speeds. The distance between our Milky Way galaxy and the Andromeda galaxy is 2,500,000 light years. Imagine an absolutely huge rocket that reached all the way back Andromeda and the Milky Way. If this rocket traveled at 10%, the speed of light, a clock synchronization of 250,000 years would appear between a clock at the front of this rocket and a clock in the rear. The tail of the rocket would be 250,000 years in the future. If the rocket traveled at 1,000th, the speed of light the clock the synchronization would be 2500 years. If the rocket traveled at just three miles per hour, the clock synchronization would be four days. If this giant rocket travelled towards us at three miles per hour, its tail would be four days in our future. Likewise, if it traveled away from us, its nose would be four days in our past. We can understand the Andromeda paradox once we realize the rocket is not needed. All we need is for Andromeda to be moving relative to us, such as when we walk towards are away from it for the time of Andromeda to run ahead of all behind us. As it happens, Andromeda and the Milky Way are falling towards each other. They will meet in a great collision 4.5 billion years from now, see our episode. How will the world end? Because galaxies are mostly empty space. Most stars and solar systems will survive this collision unharmed, though some may be ejected from the galaxy to drift in the darkness of intergalactic space. conclusions. Special relativity is one of the most strongly confirmed of all theories in science, but its implications go well beyond space and time. Learning the true nature of time, as described by relativity fundamentally changes our notions of reality, self and existence. In some respects, special relativity has implications even venture into the religious domains of creation, freewill and eternal life can never be creation when the past, present and future have always existed. What is free will when the future is already decided? Does the existence of events in spacetime mean we possess eternal life? Let's review the implications of special relativity in more detail. Implications for reality. Reality is what's real. By convention, we assume only the present is real. But this is not based on any scientific fact just on how we feel. We feel as though we are moving through time. This feeling makes us believe we are in only the present. Therefore, we think the past no longer exists, and the future is yet to come. But Mike, this will be an illusion. That trick one's mind plays on itself. If we Take the implications of relativity seriously, then the past, present and future hold an equal claim to reality into existence. four dimensional ism, relativity offers another way to view reality. One where in every event exists perpetually in its location in spacetime. It is analogous to how every frame of a movie really exists, even when not actively projected to a screen. within every frame, we believe ourselves to occupy our time, the time we believes is the present. But each of us in each time feels that way. Which one is right? What time is it really? According to relativity, the word now becomes like the word here. Neither word reflects a property of the universe but instead reflects the property of the person speaking it, quote, just as we envision all spaces really being out there as really exists We should also envision all of time as really being out there as really existing to end quote. The physicist Brian Greene in the Elegant Universe 1999 the view that the past present and future are all equally real is known as eternalism also called four dimensional ism or block time eternalism follows directly from special relativity. We have seen length contracted objects can reach through time, they exist in different points in time at once. This is impossible, if there is only one present moment. Further, we have seen the relativity of simultaneity shows there is no single objective present. We each define our own present as one particular cross section cut through the block of space time. But if all points in time exist, what accounts for change Why do we feel as though we move forward into the future is changing illusion. philosophers have long debated whether change is real or illusory. Some 2500 years ago, the Greek philosopher Pamina DS argued that existence is timeless and any appearance of change is an illusion. Quote, what is is uncreated and indestructible, alone, complete, immovable, and without end, end quote, Tommy entities in the way of the truth, circa 475 BC, since the time of permittees, this question was considered to belong to the domain of philosophers, not scientists. It took science thousands of years, but special relativity has finally proven Pamina it is right in four dimensional space time change as a future coming into being and then disappearing. into a non existent past doesn't happen. Quote, it appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence instead of as to the to the evolution of a three dimensional existence. And quote, Albert Einstein in relativity, the special and General Theory 15th edition 1952. This was not just a quirky belief of Einstein, it remains the present understanding of modern physicists. Events in space time are interrelated by causality, like adjacent points on the graph of a function. Special Relativity provides a framework to understand how events are interconnected within an unchanging four dimensional structure. Just as we might say the value of a graph f of x changes with respect to x, we can say an object's position P of t changes with respect to to time t. This accounts for the appearance of change and motion where objectively there is none. All the positions payoff t across all times exist, just like all the points on the graph exist at once. Why is the future unknowable? when an object reaches through time, it extends into both the past and future. This means at some level, the future is real. We get further evidence of this from anti matter, anti particles seem to enter our present, arriving from some future point in time. According to the spacetime view, future events are every bit as real and determined as past events. This means the future is already written. All points in time exist. Yet in each time, we have stored memories only of the past. We have no memories of any future time. what accounts for this asymmetry? If the future is real. Why can't we remember tomorrow? times arrow. The unknowability of the future has nothing to do with whether or not the future exists. Whether the future exists or not, or is predetermined or not. Physics explains why we have no knowledge of it is an artifact of how our brains process and store information. According to thermodynamics, energy can only be expended in the direction of time along which entropy increases. Since processing and storing information requires an expenditure of energy, our brains, or anything that uses energy can only operate in one direction of time, the direction in which entropy increases from past to future. Some events that are common in one direction of time are unlikely in other directions of time. For example, it is common to see someone jump into a pool, but we've never seen water molecules spontaneously throw someone out of a pool. It is the same with systems that process information. They can't operate going backwards in time. If they could, we might see hard drives manifest pictures taken tomorrow. Since entropy increases from the past to the future, our brains can only operate along that time direction. Accordingly, we can only store memories of the past, memories of the future are impossible. Our deeply ingrained belief in flowing time and an unknown future is not due to the non existence of the future, but rather physical limitations on how systems are allowed to process information. See our episode. Why does time have an arrow? implications for self special relativity doesn't just redefine our picture of reality. It also is the concept of ourselves as temporary beings moving through time It makes us question whether we can even make any decisions at all. Do we have freewill? The ideas of determinism, freewill predestination for knowledge and omniscience have historically been deeply intertwined. Can we exercise a free will when the future is pre determined? What about when future events already exist in space time? differences of opinion on such questions have even caused divisions between different religious sects and denominations. For instance, Calvinists believe that God knows in advance who is destined for salvation and damnation. other denominations believe only in predestination of those destined to be saved. The question of whether we have freewill and whether free will is compatible with determinism or for knowledge is nuanced. For a detailed consideration, see our episode do humans have freewill Religion and special relativity. various religions of suppose things about reality and time that aren't far off from the ideas of special relativity. relativity of viewpoints. Within Jain ism is a doctrine known as an account Avada meaning the relativity and multiplicity of views. It is the idea that there is no absolute viewpoint of reality. Rather reality can be perceived differently according to different points of view. James also believe that the universe is uncreated and eternal, existence of all times and events. In Hinduism, on also on signifies Brahman, the ground of being, quote, the unchanging arm is the all its expansion is what has been, what is what shall be and what is beyond the three times is all So I'm for all this is the eternal and this self is the eternal and this self has four aspects, and quote manduka apana shad circa 200 ad. religions that consider God to know the future often described future events as already existing, at least existing within the mind of God. Quote, God, bowing to his infallible prescients of the future has appointed and ordained from eternity all events occurring in time, especially those that directly proceed from or at least are influenced by man's freewill and quote, The Catholic Encyclopedia. eternal life. relativity tells us no single point of view regarding time, space or motion is more correct than any other. All views are correct from their own frames of reference. They means the present time is not some fact of the universe but merely an opinion shared by contemporaries. This fact implies eternal life and a form of immortality sees us still lives. Consider the case of gawk an alien from Andromeda gawk fast spaceship that can travel 240 kilometres per second, about 17 times faster than our Voyager space probes. If coke travels towards the Milky Way, his present contains Earth as it will be 2000 years in the future. If gawks ship is stopped, his presence contains earth as it is today. If gawks ship travels away from Earth, his present contains Earth as it was 2000 years ago. From corks perspective in Andromeda you could either be one not yet born to alive and reading this article or Three, long dead. It all depends on which direction his ship is going. How can I present ancient Rome and the far future all exist only with a four dimensional reality? Can we make sense of this? accordingly, we must dispense with the idea that time flows or that there's an objective present. In this revised view, Julius Caesar is alive. He's just in a location 2000 light years behind us in space time. From Caesar's viewpoint, the present is a little bit four zero ad, and none of us are yet born. Our opinion that he is long dead doesn't bother him. No more than the opinions of people born in 4000 ad bother us. There exists times long before you were born and times long after you died. But despite the opinions of people in those other times, you are here alive and well. Within the time span of your life. Similarly, those who are dead or are not yet born, from our perspective, feel the same alive and well in their own times. It's no coincidence the present year happens to be a time during your life rather than a billion years in the past or future, you will always find yourself in a point in time where you exist. relativity has brought physicists to this conclusion. righties, who proved that relativity requires four dimensional ism wrote, quote, of course, man is four dimensional just like all other organisms and objects. This mere situation implies that there is a life after death, namely that part of the four dimensional human being that exists after the moment of his death and quote, cw varieties can four dimensional reality continued 20 Humans have spatial borders, we have a height, breadth, and depth. Humans also have temporal borders. These borders stretch through space time from one's birthday to the day one dies. A 70 year lifespan extends 70 light years through spacetime, forming a long thin spiral helix Winding 70 times around the sun. That is our true nature as four dimensional beings. tenacious illusion. The common view of time as something pressing forward leads many to assume they will cease to exist once this moving present passes beyond the day they die. relativity reveals this fear to be unsupported, for it implies a perpetual and eternal existence of all locations and times. Fearing that you cease to exist because you have a future temporal border is as silly as fear you cease to exist because you have spatial borders, or a temporal border in the past. What exists is not just one present moment, but the whole apple or the entire movie real, all spacetime, every moment of the past, present, and future. This view has been expressed by eminent scientists, including Albert Einstein, Hermann Minkowski, Wim riteish, Hilary Putnam, Richard Fineman, Roger Penrose, and Brian Greene. But if before and after are not absolute, what does that imply for the afterlife? What is an afterlife if there is no laughter? on this question, Einstein revealed his thoughts. Michele besso was a lifelong friends to Einstein. They met as students in Zurich WSO helped Einstein get a job at the Swiss Patent Office. WSO also helped Einstein to develop his ideas. He was the only person Einstein credited in his paper on special relativity. as Einstein lay on his deathbed, approaching his own temporal border, he received word that Beto died. He wrote a letter of consolation to Bezos family writing in part, quote, now he has again proceeded me a little in parting from this strange world. This has no importance. For people like us who believe in physics, the separation between past, present and future has only the importance of an admittedly tenacious illusion. And quote, Albert Einstein, in a letter to besos family 1955. Einstein departed from this strange world on April 18 1955, just weeks after writing that letter, Einstein believed that death has no importance because the difference between the past present And future is only an illusion. many religions promise eternal life. If special relativity is true, you already have it. You exist eternally. Your life is yours forever. Make it a good one.

Amy :

This has been another episode presented by always where we ask the big questions. Thanks for listening